4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Coronal mass ejections, type II radio bursts, and solar energetic particle events in the SOHO era

Journal

ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 3033-3047

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-26-3033-2008

Keywords

Interplanetary physics; Interplanetary shocks; Solar physics, astrophysics, and astronomy; Energetic particles; Flares and mass ejections; Radio emissions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the extensive and uniform data on coronal mass ejections (CMEs), solar energetic particle (SEP) events, and type II radio bursts during the SOHO era, we discuss how the CME properties such as speed, width and solar-source longitude decide whether CMEs are associated with type II radio bursts and SEP events. We discuss why some radio-quiet CMEs are associated with small SEP events while some radio-loud CMEs are not associated with SEP events. We conclude that either some fast and wide CMEs do not drive shocks or they drive weak shocks that do not produce significant levels of particle acceleration. We also infer that the Alfven speed in the corona and near-Sun interplanetary medium ranges from <200 km/s to >= 1600 km/s. Radio-quiet fast and wide CMEs are also poor SEP producers and the association rate of type II bursts and SEP events steadily increases with CME speed and width (i.e. energy). If we consider western hemispheric CMEs, the SEP association rate increases linearly from similar to 30% for 800 km/s CMEs to 100% for >= 1800 km/s. Essentially all type II bursts in the decametre-hectometric (DH) wavelength range are associated with SEP events once the source location on the Sun is taken into account. This is a significant result for space weather applications, because if a CME originating from the western hemisphere is accompanied by a DH type II burst, there is a high probability that it will produce an SEP event.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available