4.4 Article

Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) efflux transport at the blood-brain barrier via P-glycoprotein

Journal

DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 6-9

Publisher

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.107.017699

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oseltamivir (Tamiflu, Roche, Nutley, NJ), an ester-type prodrug of the anti-influenza drug Ro 64-0802 (oseltamivir carboxylate), has been reported to be associated with neuropsychiatric side effects, which are likely to be caused by distribution of oseltamivir and/or its metabolite into the central nervous system. Enhanced toxicity and brain distribution of oseltamivir in unweaned rats led us to hypothesize that the low level of distribution of oseltamivir and/or Ro 64-0802 in adult brain was caused by the presence of a specific efflux transporter at the blood-brain barrier. We examined the possible role of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) as the determinant of brain distribution of oseltamivir and Ro 64-0802 both in vitro using LLC-GA5-COL150 cells, which overexpress human multidrug resistance protein 1 P-gp on the apical membrane, and in vivo using mdr1a/1b knockout mice. The permeability of oseltamivir in the basal-to-apical direction was significantly greater than that in the opposite direction. The directional transport disappeared on addition of cyclosporin A, a P-gp inhibitor. The brain distribution of oseltamivir was increased in mdr1a/1b knockout mice compared with wildtype mice. In contrast, negligible transport of Ro 64-0802 by P-gp was observed in both in vitro and in vivo studies. These results show that oseltamivir, but not Ro 64-0802, is a substrate of P-gp. Accordingly, low levels of P-gp activity or drug-drug interactions at P-gp may lead to enhanced brain accumulation of oseltamivir, and this may in turn account for the central nervous system effects of oseltamivir observed in some patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available