4.5 Article

What Did I Say? Versus What Did I Think? Attributing False Beliefs to Self Amongst Children With and Without Autism

Journal

JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 865-873

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-009-0695-6

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder; Theory of mind; False belief; Unexpected contents task; Self-awareness

Funding

  1. Department of Health Funding Source: Medline
  2. ESRC [ES/F016638/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/F016638/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The task used most widely to assess recognition of false belief in self and others is the 'Smarties' unexpected contents task. Amongst individuals with and without autism, the Self and Other-person test questions of this task are of an equivalent level of difficulty. However, a potential confound with this task may allow the Self test question to be passed without false belief competence. Three groups of participants (with autism, developmental disability and typical development) undertook a new unexpected contents task which did not suffer from this confound. The main finding was that participants with autism performed significantly less well on the Self test question than the Other-person test question on this new task. Individuals with autism may have greater difficulty representing their own beliefs than the beliefs of other people.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available