4.7 Article

COLD-SEASON THUNDERSTORMS IN FINLAND AND THEIR EFFECT ON AVIATION SAFETY

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages 847-858

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00039.1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A total of 13 commercial airplanes were struck by lightning in October (10 in 1 day) and December (3 on 3 separate days) 2011 in the main Finnish Helsinki-Vantaa airport. The number of lightning-struck airplanes is extremely large, considering the time of year and the small number of flashes by the storms. This paper indicates the characteristics of these cases regarding the synoptic situation as well as their forecasting. There were remarkable differences in the operational models; the high-resolution nonhydrostatic model was superior in predicting the convective nature of the event compared to the coarser-resolution hydrostatic model. The interview of the pilots of the struck airplanes shows that the pilots did not receive detailed information to avoid the situation; also, the lightning strike affected the pilots, even causing temporary loss of sight and hearing. Luckily, no fatalities or severe damage to the airplanes occurred. The most interesting case is 19 October 2011; during this single day, a total of 10 airplanes were struck. The analysis suggests that a major cause for the large number of struck airplanes is that the planes took off directly into the convective core of the storm and the planes initialized the flashes themselves. However, the time of the year, the near position of the storm area relative to the takeoff path, and the necessity to use only a certain takeoff path because of the direction of wind makes the convective scenario difficult to predict and avoid. The pilots have expressed interest in receiving training for these cold-season thunderstorms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available