4.5 Article

Predictive models of prolonged mechanical ventilation yield moderate accuracy

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 502-505

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.01.020

Keywords

Mechanical ventilation; Mechanical ventilator weaning; Epidemiological methods; Projections and predictions; Regression analyses

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To develop a model to predict prolonged mechanical ventilation within 48 hours of its initiation. Materials and Methods: In 282 general intensive care unit patients, multiple variables from the first 2 days on mechanical ventilation and their total ventilation duration were prospectively collected. Three models accounting for early deaths were developed using different analyses: (a) multinomial logistic regression to predict duration > 7 days vs duration <= 7 days alive vs duration <= 7 days death; (b) binary logistic regression to predict duration > 7 days for the entire cohort and for survivors only, separately; and (c) Cox regression to predict time to being free of mechanical ventilation alive. Results: Positive end-expiratory pressure, postoperative state (negatively), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score were independently associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation. The multinomial regression model yielded an accuracy (95% confidence interval) of 60% (53%-64%). The binary regression models yielded accuracies of 67% (61%-72%) and 69% (63%-75%) for the entire cohort and for survivors, respectively. The Cox regression model showed an equivalent to area under the curve of 0.67 (0.62-0.71). Conclusions: Different predictive models of prolonged mechanical ventilation in general intensive care unit patients achieve a moderate level of overall accuracy, likely insufficient to assist in clinical decisions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available