4.4 Article

Access to Housing in Urban China

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00848.x

Keywords

urban China; housing; migrants; hukou; tenure; privatization; market reform

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R24 HD041020] Funding Source: Medline
  2. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R24HD041020] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Like income inequality, housing inequality in urban China is strongly affected by state policies that give preferential treatment to insiders. In this case, the key policies are related to their residence status, which involves not only their migration history but also their legal position. Using data from the Chinese census of 2000 for eight large cities, this study shows how residence status affects access to various pathways to housing. In addition to the well-known marginal housing situation of the recent 'floating population', it documents surprising advantages for migrants with urban registration status and persistent disadvantages for rural migrants regardless of how long they have lived in the city. Resume Comme l'inegalite de revenu, l'inegalite de logement dans les villes chinoises est nettement affectee par les mesures etatiques qui privilegient les residents en place. En l'occurrence, les politiques determinantes s'attachent au statut de residence, ce qui recouvre la fois l'historique migratoire des individus et leur situation juridique. partir des donnees du recensement chinois de 2000 dans huit grandes villes, l'etude montre comment le statut de residence influe sur l'acces aux differents canaux conduisant un logement. Outre la condition de logement marginale bien connue de la 'population flottante' recente, sont exposes les surprenants atouts des migrants qui sont enregistres comme urbains, et les inconvenients persistants que rencontrent les migrants ruraux quelle que soit la duree pendant laquelle ils ont vecu dans la ville.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available