4.6 Article

Effects of Trunk Restraint Combined With Intensive Task Practice on Poststroke Upper Extremity Reach and Function: A Pilot Study

Journal

NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 78-91

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308318836

Keywords

Stroke; Rehabilitation; Upper extremity; Kinematics

Funding

  1. Office of Research and Development
  2. Rehabilitation Research and Development Service and the Office of Academic Affairs
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs (RRD [F2182C]
  4. VA Associate Investigator Award [N4725H]
  5. National Institute of Health T32 Institutional Training Grant (NIH [T32 HD043730]
  6. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida
  7. The Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Trust Fund, PI: Dena Howland [A-15 2003]
  8. Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida
  9. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [T32HD043730] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Poststroke reaching is characterized by excessive trunk motion and abnormal shoulder-elbow coordination. Little attention is typically given to arm-trunk kinematics during task practice. Preventing compensatory trunk motion during short-term practice immediately improves kinematics, but effects of longer-term practice are unknown. Objective. This study compared the effects of intensive task practice with and without trunk restraint on poststroke reaching kinematics and function. Methods. A total of 11 individuals with chronic stroke, baseline Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment scores 26 to 54, were randomized to 2 constraint-therapy intervention groups. All participants wore a mitt on the unaffected hand for 90% of waking hours over 14 days and participated in 10 days/6 hours/day of supervised progressive task practice. During supervised sessions, one group trained with a trunk restraint (preventing anterior trunk motion) and one group did not. Tasks for the trunk-restraint group were located to afford repeated use of a shoulder flexion-elbow extension reaching pattern. Outcome measures included kinematics of unrestrained targeted reaching and tests of functional arm ability. Results. Posttraining, the trunk-restraint group demonstrated straighter reach trajectories (P = .000) and less trunk displacement (P = .001). The trunk-restraint group gained shoulder flexion (P = .006) and elbow extension (P = .022) voluntary ranges of motion, the nonrestraint group did not. Posttraining angle-angle plots illustrated that individuals from the trunk-restraint group transitioned from elbow flexion to elbow extension during mid-reach; individuals in the nonrestraint group retained pretraining movement strategies. Both groups gained functional arm ability (P < .05 all tests). Conclusion. Intensive task practice structured to prevent compensatory trunk movements and promote shoulder flexion-elbow extension coordination may reinforce development of normal reaching kinematics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available