4.1 Article

Delirium and long-term cognitive impairment

Journal

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 30-42

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09540260802675031

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. MRC [G108/646] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0700704B] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Funding Source: Medline
  4. Medical Research Council [G108/646] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Delirium is a severe, acute neuropsychiatric syndrome that is highly prevalent in acute hospital populations. Delirium has noticeable effects on length of hospitalization, cost of care, mortality and morbidity. In addition to these well-established adverse consequences, there is increasing evidence linking delirium and a higher risk of long-term cognitive impairment (LTCI), including dementia. A prior review (Jackson, Gordon, Hart, Hopkins, Ely, 2004), in which nine studies (total N = 1,885, years 1989-2003) were considered, concluded that there was evidence for an association between delirium and LTCI. Here we provide a review of studies published since Jackson's review. We included nine reports, with a total of 2,025 patients. The studies show diverse sample sizes, methodologies, designs and patient populations. However, taken together, the results of these new studies broadly confirm that there is a link between delirium and LTCI. We go on to discuss putative mechanisms and explanations. These include (1) delirium as a marker of chronic progressive pathology, but unrelated to any progression, (2) delirium as a consequence of acute brain damage which is also responsible for a 'single hit' or triggering of active processes causing LTCI, (3) delirium itself as a cause of LTCI, and (4) drug treatment of delirium or other conditions as a cause of LTCI. We conclude with suggestions for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available