4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

The effects of temperature on detection of prey DNA in two species of carabid beetle

Journal

BULLETIN OF ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages 263-269

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007485308006020

Keywords

Carabidae; DNA decay; gut content analysis; Homoptera; PCR

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PCR-based techniques to investigate predator-prey trophic interactions are starting to be used more widely, but factors affecting DNA decay in predator guts are still poorly understood. Here, we investigated the effects of time since feeding, temperature and amplicon size on the detectability of prey DNA in the gut content of two closely related predator species. Cereal aphids, Sitobion avenae, were fed to the carabid beetles Pterostichus melanarius and Nebria brevicollis. Beetles were allowed to digest their meal at 12 degrees C, 16 degrees C and 20 degrees C, and batches of beetles were subsequently frozen at time periods from 0-72h after feeding. Aphid DNA was detected within beetles' gut contents using primers amplifying fragments of 85, 231, 317 and 383bp. Prey DNA detection rates were significantly higher in N. brevicollis than in P. melanarius, indicating fundamental dissimilarities in prey digestion capacities. High temperatures (20 degrees C) and large amplicons (383bp) significantly decreased detection rates. The shortest amplicon gave the highest prey DNA detection success, whereas no differences were observed between the 231bp and the 317bp fragment. Our results indicate that factors such as ambient temperature, predator taxon and amplicon size should all be considered when interpreting data derived from PCR-based prey detection. Correction for such factors should make calculation of predation rates in the field more accurate and could help us to estimate when predation events occur in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available