4.4 Review

Promoting Resilience in Youth From Divorced Families: Lessons Learned From Experimental Trials of the New Beginnings Program

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages 1833-1868

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00602.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH057013, P30MH039246, P30MH068685, R01MH049155] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH057013-03, 2R01 MH49155-06, 5P30MH068685-3, P30 MH068685-03, 1R01MH057013-01A1, P30 MH068685, R01 MH049155, P30 MH039246-189007, R01 MH057013-02] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [2P30 M439246-18] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article focuses on the contributions that the program of research on the New Beginnings Program (NBP) has made to understanding pathways to resilience in youth who experience parental divorce. First, the research demonstrating that divorce increases risk for mental health, physical health, and social adaptation problems is reviewed. Next, theory and research linking social environmental-level and youth-level modifiable risk factors and resilience resources to youth's postdivorce adjustment are presented. The conceptual framework underlying the NBP and the risk factors and resilience resources targeted in this program are described next. The short-term and long-term results of two experimental, randomized efficacy trials of the NBP and moderators and mediators of its effects are then presented. Analyses that examine whether youth self-systems beliefs account for the links between program-induced changes in family-level resilience resources and positive long-term program on adaptation outcomes are presented and how experimental trials can be used to further theories of resilience for youth facing adversities is discussed. The final section describes directions for future research on the NBP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available