4.7 Article

Performance of ductless personalized ventilation in conjunction with displacement ventilation: Physical environment and human response

Journal

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 354-364

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.07.011

Keywords

Human response; Thermal comfort; Perceived air quality; Warm environment; Local convective cooling; Personalised ventilation

Funding

  1. Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation [09-070621]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of ductless personalized ventilation (DPV) in conjunction with displacement ventilation was studied and compared with displacement ventilation alone and mixing ventilation. Thirty subjects were exposed in a climate chamber to environmental conditions representing three levels of indoor air temperature (23, 26 and 29 degrees C) and three levels of temperature difference between indoor air temperature and supply air temperature: 3, 5 or 6 K below room temperature. During a 1 h exposure the subjects answered questions with regard to thermal comfort, perceived air quality and general perception of the environment. The subjects could control the position of the DPV supply diffuser and the personalized air flow (air velocity). The use of DPV improved perceived air quality and thermal comfort compared to displacement ventilation alone. At 26 degrees C and 29 degrees C the percentage dissatisfied with air movement decreased with DPV compared to corresponding conditions with displacement ventilation alone and reached the same level as mixing or displacement ventilation at 23 degrees C. Subjects were able to control the volume and speed of the personalized air flow in order to avoid eye irritation. However, increased eye dryness sensation was reported by 30% of subjects. The personalized air flow selected by nearly 80% of the subjects at 26 degrees C was between 10 and 20 l/s corresponding to the target air velocity of 1.2-1.7 m/s. At 29 degrees C almost 90% of subjects chose a personalized air flow between 15 and 20 l/s (1.5 -1.7 m/s). (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available