4.7 Review

Genomic islands: tools of bacterial horizontal gene transfer and evolution

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 376-393

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00136.x

Keywords

horizontal gene transfer; genomic island; evolution; pathogenicity; biodegradation

Categories

Funding

  1. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Programme, Infection Theme, Oxford, UK
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [3100-67229]
  3. MRC [G0400039] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0400039] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial genomes evolve through mutations, rearrangements or horizontal gene transfer. Besides the core genes encoding essential metabolic functions, bacterial genomes also harbour a number of accessory genes acquired by horizontal gene transfer that might be beneficial under certain environmental conditions. The horizontal gene transfer contributes to the diversification and adaptation of microorganisms, thus having an impact on the genome plasticity. A significant part of the horizontal gene transfer is or has been facilitated by genomic islands (GEIs). GEIs are discrete DNA segments, some of which are mobile and others which are not, or are no longer mobile, which differ among closely related strains. A number of GEIs are capable of integration into the chromosome of the host, excision, and transfer to a new host by transformation, conjugation or transduction. GEIs play a crucial role in the evolution of a broad spectrum of bacteria as they are involved in the dissemination of variable genes, including antibiotic resistance and virulence genes leading to generation of hospital 'superbugs', as well as catabolic genes leading to formation of new metabolic pathways. Depending on the composition of gene modules, the same type of GEIs can promote survival of pathogenic as well as environmental bacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available