4.7 Article

Dispersion of coughed droplets in a fully-occupied high-speed rail cabin

Journal

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages 58-66

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.03.015

Keywords

Infection; Droplet transport; Train cabin environment; High-speed rail

Funding

  1. Research Grant Committee of the Hong Kong SAR Government [HKU 714608E]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dispersion process of respiratory droplets released by coughing of an individual in a high speed rail cabin is studied using CFD simulations. The cabin is fully-occupied by 48 passengers with a seating arrangement of 12 rows and 4 columns. Four cases of different boundary conditions of air supply and exhausts are studied. The droplets dispersion characteristics and the maximum dispersion distances under specified ventilation conditions are studied. All 48 passengers are simulated by relatively realistic three-dimensional thermal manikins. The coughing individual is located on an aisle seat in the seventh row. The duration of a single cough is assumed to be 0.4 s: and a time-dependent coughing velocity profile is used. Within the first 10 s after coughing, a separation phenomenon of the so-called old and new droplets is observed. The old droplets generated in the first 0.2 s escaped from the body plume, and were injected into the lower zone of the cabin. These droplets stayed longer in the lower zone of the cabin. The new droplets generated in the next 0.2 s, had a relatively small velocity, and thus followed the upward body plume, entering directly the upper zone. The luggage rack also has an effect on the airflow patterns in the HSR cabin. The droplets removal ability is stronger when there is a through flow from the front door to back. However, in this situation, the droplets can disperse much further and affect more passengers. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available