4.7 Article

Mathematical model of particle penetration through smooth/rough building envelop leakages

Journal

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 1144-1149

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.08.007

Keywords

Mathematical model; Particle; Deposition; Penetration factor; Roughness

Funding

  1. Doctoral Funds for Higher Education of China [20040532020]
  2. 11th Five Year National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2006BAJ02A10, 2006BA02A08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

People in China spend about 85% of their time indoor, of which residential building accounts for about 50%. Furthermore, most residential dwellings do not have mechanical ventilation systems, and air infiltrates during heating and cooling seasons. Consequently, human inhalation exposure to particles of outdoor origin depends substantially on the degree to which particles can penetrate the building envelope and remain suspended in indoor air. In this paper, the impact factors of particle penetration are analyzed, and a mathematical model is developed to simulate particle penetration through cracks with rough/smooth inner surfaces. For smooth inner surfaces, the results from the mathematical model show good agreement with the experimental data; for penetration through actual building envelop, the results from the rough surface model shows better agreement than the smooth surface model. It is observed that the roughness of the cracks plays a more important role in influencing deposition of particles with diameter d < 0.04 mu m. The roughness mainly influences the Brownian diffusion mechanism of particles deposition. Discrepancies exist between two models and experimental data for particles with diameter ranging from 0.075 to 0.54 mu m, which implies that inertia interception caused by roughness plays a more important role in enhancing deposition for particles in this range. The thermal property of the building shell is not an effective factor at removing infiltrated particles. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available