4.1 Article

Changes in Landscape-Scale Habitat Selection of Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in Managed North-Boreal Forest

Journal

SILVA FENNICA
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 595-608

Publisher

FINNISH SOC FOREST SCIENCE-NATURAL RESOURCES INST FINLAND
DOI: 10.14214/sf.182

Keywords

capercaillie; forestry; landscape composition; wildlife triangle

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We Studied changes in habitat selection of capercaillie in northern Finnish boreal forests at two spatial scales during two time periods, 1989-1992 and 2000-2003. We studied capercaillie densities and their changes between the study periods in relation to the landscape class proportions within 3-km buffer zones around the wildlife triangle center points. Furthermore, we compared the landscape class proportions in 800-meter buffer zones around capercaillie wildlife triangle count observations and around the counted wildlife triangle transects using t-tests and compositional analysis. At the local Population scale (3 km) the change in adult density between the study periods was associated positively with the proportion Of Young thinning stands in 2003 and reversely with the mature stand (1992 and 2003) and clear-cut (1992) proportions. Capercaillie juvenile and pooled densities during 2000-2003 were positively associated with the advanced thinning stand proportion in 2003. At the capercaillie home range scale (800 m) habitats were rich in mature stands during 1989-1992 in relation to available habitats, but not during 2000-2003 when young thinning stands were more abundant in relation to available habitats. Relatively young managed forests can be suitable for capercaillie, but mature managed forests as capercaillie habitats may have deteriorated between the study periods. Spatial planning may help to form suitable areas that are large enough for the species, but the highest potential may Jay in the forest stand scale, where increased cover on the ground Could promote the habitat quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available