Journal
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages 634-640Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00071660903186570
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
1. In 6 incubation trials a total of 9883 eggs (Ross 308) were incubated from d 1 to 17 under normal incubation conditions (37 center dot 2-37 center dot 4 degrees C) and then sorted into three hatch incubators (control: 37 center dot 2-37 center dot 4 degrees C; chronic warm incubation: 38 center dot 2-38 center dot 4 degrees C, 24 h daily; short-term warm stimulation: 38 center dot 2-38 center dot 4 degrees C, 2 h daily) in incubation trials 1 and 2 or two hatch incubators (control and short-term warm stimulation) in trials 3-6. 2. The one-day-old chicks were selected by sex and chick quality was analysed in random samples using the Pasgar (c) score. A total of 120 male and 120 female one-day-old chickens from each incubator were used for a 35-d fattening period. 3. Neither chronic nor short-term increase in incubation temperature had a negative effect on hatchability and chick quality. Short-term warm stimulation improved hatchability by more than 1 center dot 5% and was associated with a significantly higher proportion of hatched male chicks. 4. In the subsequent broiler growth trial, the mean daily weight gain of the short-term warm stimulated male broiler chicks was significant higher than for the control group, which results in a body weight increase of 2 center dot 9%. 5. Feed conversion (feed:gain ratio) of the short-term warm stimulated male and female broilers was significantly lower than in the males and females of the control and chronic warm incubated groups. 6. In conclusion, an incubation temperature profile which includes short-term temperature variation can be important in improving poultry performance (European patent pending since March 2008).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available