4.5 Article

The role of mandibular proximal segment rotations on skeletal relapse and condylar remodelling following bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomies

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 43, Issue 9, Pages 1716-1722

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.07.022

Keywords

3D; Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy; CBCT; Condylar remodelling; Proximal segment; Relapse

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [017.005.006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To quantify the postoperative rotation of the proximal segments in 3D and to assess its role on skeletal relapse and condylar remodelling following BSSO advancement surgery. Material and methods: 56 patients with mandibular hypoplasia who underwent BSSO advancement surgery were enrolled into the study. A CBCT scan was acquired preoperatively, at one week post-operatively and at one year postoperatively. After segmentation of the facial skeleton and condyles, 3D cephalometry and condylar volume analysis were performed. Results: A mean mandibular advancement of 4.6 mm was found. 55% of the condyles decreased in volume postoperatively, with a mean reduction of 6.1 volume-percent. Among 11 patients who exhibited a clinically significant relapse of more than 2 mm, 10 patients exhibited a counterclockwise rotation of the proximal segments. The odds of skeletal relapse (>2 mm) was 4.8 times higher in patients whose proximal segments were rotated in a counterclockwise direction. Postoperative flaring (3.3 mm) and torque (0.3 degrees) were, however, not associated with skeletal relapse or condylar remodelling. Conclusion: Gender, preoperative condylar volume, postoperative condylar remodelling, counterclockwise rotation of the proximal segment and the amount of surgical advancement were prognostic factors for skeletal relapse (r(2) = 0.83). The role of the mandibular plane angle in relapse is questionable. (C) 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available