4.4 Article

Anxiety, Processing Efficiency, and Cognitive Performance New Developments from Attentional Control Theory

Journal

EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 168-176

Publisher

HOGREFE & HUBER PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.168

Keywords

anxiety; performance; attention; efficiency; central executive

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-000-23-1529] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. ESRC [RES-000-23-1529] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There have been many attempts to account theoretically for the effects of anxiety on cognitive performance. This article focuses on two theories based on insights from cognitive psychology. The more recent is the attentional control theory (Eysenck, Derakshan, Santos, & Calvo, 2007), which developed from the earlier processing efficiency theory (Eysenck & Calvo, 1992). Both theories assume there is a fundamental distinction between performance effectiveness (quality of performance) and processing efficiency (the relationship between performance effectiveness and use of processing resources), and that anxiety impairs processing efficiency more than performance effectiveness. Both theories also assume that anxiety impairs the efficiency of the central executive component of the working memory system. In addition, attentional control theory assumes that anxiety impairs the efficiency of two types of attentional control: (1) negative attentional control (involved in inhibiting attention to task-irrelevant stimuli); and (2) positive attentional control (involved in flexibly switching attention between and within tasks to maximize performance). Recent (including unpublished) research relevant to theoretical predictions from attentional control theory is discussed. In addition, future directions for theory and research in the area of anxiety and performance are presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available