4.6 Article

Use of baseline factors to predict complications and reinterventions after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 97, Issue 8, Pages 1207-1217

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7104

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme within the Department of Health of the UK Government
  2. UK Medical Research Council [U.1052.00.001]
  3. British Heart Foundation [RG/08/014/24067] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_U105260792] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. MRC [MC_U105260792] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: It is uncertain which baseline factors are associated with graft-related complications and reinterventions after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with a large abdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods: Patients randomized to elective EVAR in EVAR Trial 1 or 2 were followed for serious graft-related complications (type 2 endoleaks excluded) and reinterventions. Cox regression analysis was used to investigate whether any prespecified baseline factors were associated with time to first serious complication or reintervention. Results: A total of 756 patients who had elective EVAR were followed for a mean of 3.7 years, by which time there were 179 serious graft complications (rate 6.5 per 100 person years) and 114 reinterventions (rate 3.8 per 100 person years). The highest rate was during the first 6 months, with an apparent increase again after 2 years. Multivariable analysis indicated that graft-related complications increased significantly with larger initial aneurysm diameter (P < 0.001) and older age (P = 0.040). There was also evidence that patients with larger common iliac diameters experienced higher complication rates (P = 0.011). Conclusion: Graft-related complication and reintervention rates were common after EVAR in patients with a large aneurysm. Younger patients and those with aneurysms closer to the 5.5-cm threshold for intervention experienced lower rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available