4.2 Article

Hyperglycaemia as part of the stress response: the underlying mechanisms

Journal

BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 375-386

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2009.08.005

Keywords

stress hyperglycaemia; critical illness; glucose metabolism; insulin; cytokines; stress hormones; insulin resistance; insulin therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders, Belgium [G.053.06, G.0585.09]
  2. Research Council of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven [GOA2007/14]
  3. Flemish Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stress hyperglycaemia is a distinctive clinical feature of critical illness. Stress mediators, namely stress hormones, cytokines and the central nervous system, interfere with normal carbohydrate metabolism, especially in the liver and skeletal muscle. Central insulin resistance, defined as increased hepatic gluconeogenesis and glucose output despite abundant endogenous insulin levels, appears pivotal to the occurrence of stress hyperglycaemia. The skeletal muscle is refractory to insulin action too. Peripheral insulin resistance is predominantly attributed to inhibition of the skeletal muscle glycogen synthesis. Significantly increased non-insulin-mediated glucose transport into the skeletal muscle overrules defective insulin-mediated glucose transport. Inflammatory mediators and counter-regulatory hormones have been shown to impede crucial elements of the insulin-signalling pathway (insulin receptor substrates/IRS-1/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/Glucose Transporter 4). Still, exogenous insulin administration normalises blood glucose levels in this setting. Insulin treatment may counteract hepatic insulin resistance during acute critical illness. During prolonged critical illness, therapeutic insulin effects seem mediated by increased skeletal muscle glucose uptake and use. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available