4.6 Article

Follow-up schedules after treatment for malignant melanoma

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 95, Issue 11, Pages 1401-1407

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6347

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Stichting VSB Fonds
  2. Stichting Dr Hendrik Muller's Vaderlandsch Fonds
  3. Stichting Fonds Doctor Catherine van Tussenbroek
  4. Nell Ongerhoer Fonds
  5. Stichting Groninger Universiteits Fonds
  6. Stichting De Korintiers
  7. Nederlandse Kankerbestrijding-Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds
  8. Marco Polo Fonds
  9. The Melanoma Foundation of the University of Sydney
  10. Integraal Kankercentrum Noord-Nederland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Existing follow-up guidelines after treatment for melanoma are based largely on dated literature and historical precedent. This study aimed to calculate recurrence rates and establish prognostic factors for recurrence to help redesign a follow-up schedule. Methods: Data were retrieved from the Sydney Melanoma Unit database for all patients with a single primary melanoma and American joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I-II disease, who had received their first treatment between 1959 and 2002. Recurrence rates, timing and survival were recorded by substage, and predictive factors were analysed. Results: Recurrence occurred in 18.9 per cent (895 of 4748) of patients overall, 5.2 per cent (95 of 1822) of those with stage IA disease, 18.4 per cent (264 of 1436) with IB, 28.7 per cent (215 of 750) with IIA, 40.6 per cent (213 of 524) with IIB and 44.3 per cent (86 of 194) with IIC disease. Overall, the median disease-free survival time was 2.6 years, but there were marked differences between AJCC subgroups. Primary tumour thickness, ulceration and tumour mitotic rate were important predictors of recurrence. Conclusion: A new follow-up schedule was proposed: stage I annually, stage ITA 6-monthly for 2 years and then annually, stage IIB-IIC 4-monthly for 2 years, 6-monthly in the third year and annually thereafter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available