Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages 943-949Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6302
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Publication bias occurs when statistically non-significant (negative) findings are not published. It can profoundly affect the results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative methods of detecting publication bias are described, including their advantages and disadvantages. Results and conclusion: Accepted quality standards for the reporting of meta-analyses recommend assessment of publication bias, but currently there is no uniform standard for reporting. Quantitative methods are being used with increasing frequency. Authors should take steps to minimize publication bias, and use both qualitative and quantitative assessment methods to determine whether it is present.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available