4.0 Article

Modulation of sclerostin expression by mechanical loading and bone morphogenetic proteins in osteogenic cells

Journal

BIORHEOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 389-399

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/BIR-2009-0550

Keywords

Shear stress; osteocyte; osteoblast; Sost; BMP; fluid flow

Funding

  1. David Linn Chair in Orthopaedic Surgery (DPF), [NIAMS F32 AR054226]
  2. Alliance for Better Bone Health
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [F32AR054226] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The anabolic effect of dynamic mechanical loading on skeletal architecture has been repeatedly demonstrated, but the cellular and molecular events occurring between load and ultimate bone formation remain obscure. The discovery of scle-rostin, an antagonist of Wnt/Lrp5 signaling, and the sclerosing bone dysplasias that result from its mutation suggest its pivotal role in modulating bone formation. We examined expression of Sost mRNA across a variety of clonal cell lines spanning the osteogenic phenotype from immature osteoblast to mature osteocyte. No sclerostin expression was detected in immature MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts and, surprisingly, mature MLO-Y4 osteocytes, whereas immature MLO-A5 osteocytic cells expressed very low levels of Sost. Highest expression was observed in mature UMR 106.01 osteoblasts. We examined the influence of bone morphogenetic proteins on Sost expression. Treatment with BMP-2, -4 or -6 was without effect on Sost in mature MLO-Y4 osteocytes but elicited a robust increase in Sost expression in immature MLO-A5 osteocytes. Oscillatory fluid flow applied to mature UMR 106.01 osteoblasts transiently decreased expression of sclerostin at both the mRNA and protein level. Overall, our results indicate that BMP treatment and in vitro mechanical loading demonstrate opposite effects upon sclerostin expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available