4.6 Article

The bullet cluster is not a cosmological anomaly

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/038

Keywords

cosmological simulations; galaxy clusters; gravitational lensing

Funding

  1. [NNX08AG70G]
  2. [NSF PHY-1212538]
  3. [NSF PHY-0900631]
  4. [NSF PHY-0970075]
  5. Division Of Physics
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1212538] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Bullet Cluster (1E0657-56) merger is of exceptional interest for testing the standard cold-dark-matter plus cosmological constant cosmological model, and for investigating the possible existence of a long- or short-range fifth-force in the dark sector and possible need for modifications of general relativity or even of Newtonian gravity. The most recent previous simulations of the Bullet Cluster merger required an initial infall velocity far in excess of what would be expected within the standard cosmological model, at least in the absence of additional forces or modifications to gravity. We have recently carried out much more detailed simulations than previously had been done, making pixel-by-pixel fits to 2D data-maps of the mass distribution and X-ray emission, allowing for triaxial initial configurations and including MHD and cooling. Here, we compare the initial conditions of the Bullet Cluster merger as found in our new simulations to the initial conditions in similar-mass merging clusters in the Horizon cosmological simulation. We conclude that our initial infall velocity, 2900 km/s at a separation of 2.5 Mpc, is consistent with ACDM, given the inferred main cluster mass of 2 x 10(15) M-circle dot. The initial concentration and shape found for the smaller (Bullet) cluster are typical for clusters of this mass range, but both quantities seem somewhat low for the larger (Main) cluster. Due to the paucity of examples of clusters with such a high mass in simulations, these features of the main cluster cannot presently be used to test ACDM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available