4.6 Article

Non-abelian dark matter solutions for Galactic gamma-ray excess and Perseus 3.5 keV X-ray line

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/05/053

Keywords

dark matter theory; X-rays; cosmic ray theory

Funding

  1. London Centre for Terauniverse Studies (LCTS)
  2. European Research Council via the Advanced Investigator Grant [267352]
  3. MoST of Taiwan [NSC 102-2112-M-007-015-MY3]
  4. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan
  5. London Centre for Terauniverse Studies (LCTS)
  6. European Research Council via the Advanced Investigator Grant [267352]
  7. MoST of Taiwan [NSC 102-2112-M-007-015-MY3]
  8. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We attempt to explain simultaneously the Galactic center gamma-ray excess and the 3.5 keV X-ray line from the Perseus cluster based on a class of non-abelian SU(2) DM models, in which the dark matter and an excited state comprise a dark SU(2) doublet. The non-abelian group kinetically mixes with the standard model gauge group via dimensions-5 operators. The dark matter particles annihilate into standard model fermions, followed by fragmentation and bremsstrahlung, and thus producing a continuous spectrum of gammarays. On the other hand, the dark matter particles can annihilate into a pair of excited states, each of which decays back into the dark matter particle and an X-ray photon, which has an energy equal to the mass difference between the dark matter and the excited state, which is set to be 3.5 keV. The large hierarchy between the required X-ray and gamma-ray annihilation cross-sections can be achieved by a very small kinetic mixing between the SM and dark sector, which effectively suppresses the annihilation into the standard model fermions but not into the excited state.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available