4.6 Review

Prediction and prevention of musculoskeletal injury: a paradigm shift in methodology

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 43, Issue 14, Pages 1100-1107

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.065482

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-AR049735, R01-AR05563, R01-AR056259]
  2. University of Toledo College of Medicine
  3. American College of Sports Medicine Foundation Plus One Active Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditional methods employed to study musculoskeletal injury mechanisms and joint biomechanics utilise in vivo or in vitro techniques. The advent of new technology and improved methods has also given rise to in silico (computer modelling) techniques. Under the current research paradigm, in vivo, in vitro and in silico methods independently provide information regarding the mechanisms and prevention of musculoskeletal injury. However, individually, each of these methods has multiple, inherent limitations and is likely to provide incomplete answers about multifactorial, complex injury conditions. The purpose of this treatise is to review current methods used to study, understand, and prevent musculoskeletal injury and to develop new conceptual-methodological frameworks that may help create a paradigm shift in musculoskeletal injury prevention research. We term the fusion of these three techniques in simulacra amalgama, or simply in sim, meaning a union of models done on the likeness of phenomena. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury will be employed as a model example for the utility and applicability of the proposed, synthesised approach. Shifting the current experimental paradigm to incorporate a multifaceted, multidisciplinary, integration of in vivo, in vitro and in silico methods into the proposed in sim approaches may provide a platform for a more comprehensive understanding of the relationships between complex joint biomechanics and observed injury mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available