4.4 Article

Commissioning of a new wide-bore MRI scanner for radiotherapy planning of head and neck cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 86, Issue 1027, Pages -

Publisher

BRITISH INST RADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130150

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: A combination of CT and MRI is recommended for radiotherapy planning of head and neck cancers, and optimal spatial co-registration is achieved by imaging in the treatment position using the necessary immobilisation devices on both occasions, something which requires wide-bore scanners. Quality assurance experiments were carried out to commission a newly installed 1.5-T wide-bore MRI scanner and a dedicated, flexible six-channel phased array head and neck coil. Methods: Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and spatial signal uniformity were,quantified using a homogeneous aqueous phantom, and geometric distortion was quantified using a phantom with water-filled fiducials in a grid pattern. Volunteer scans were also used to determine the in vivo image quality. Clinically relevant T-1 weighted and T-2 weighted fat-suppressed sequences were assessed in multiple scan planes (both sequences fast spin echo based). The performance of two online signal uniformity correction schemes, one utilising low-resolution reference scans and the other not utilising low-resolution reference Scans, was compared. Results: Geometric distortions, for a +/- 35-kHz bandwidth, were <1mm for locations within 10 cm of the isocentre rising to 1.8 mm at 18 cm away. SNR was above 50, and uniformity in the axial plane was 71% and 95% before and after uniformity correction, respectively. Conclusion: The combined performance of the wide-bore scanner and the dedicated coil was adjudged adequate, although superior-inferior spatial coverage was slightly limited in the lower neck. Advances in knowledge: These results will be of interest to the increasing number of oncology centres that are seeking to incorporate MRI into planning practice using dedicated equipment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available