Journal
SCIENCE AS CULTURE
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 483-495Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09505430902873983
Keywords
Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy (KBBE); food safety; sustainability; performativity; virtualism
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In scientific and policy circles, the 'Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy' (KBBE) is seen as the way forward to increase productivity and competitiveness and to improve quality of life in the EU. The critical literature, however, sees KBBE as a self-fulfilling prophecy, a dominant master narrative that marginalizes other interpretations and policy options. In other words, the literature argues that KBBE is performative-it is a prescriptive model that effectively enacts itself. In this article, I contribute to this debate and argue that some aspects of KBBE actually constitute failures of performativity. In the realm of food safety, the appearance of having a system in place which functions 'as if' it followed regulation on food safety is what counts for good performance when systems are evaluated for conformity with EU rules. Little attention is paid to actual practices on the ground or the outcomes of such functioning systems. In fishery ecolabels, matching systemic compliance is more important than fulfilling the original objective of achieving sustainability. In this context, KBBE becomes a virtual abstraction, where processes and procedures become more important than outcomes, and where appearing to succeed is more important than succeeding. While appearing to match food safety procedures and ecolabelling requirements does have substantive outcomes, these do not necessarily come along the lines of the official rationales and can have negative consequences-fish stocks are at critically low levels in both locations covered in the case studies.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available