4.6 Article

Detecting boosted dark matter from the Sun with large volume neutrino detectors

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/005

Keywords

dark matter theory; dark matter experiments; neutrino experiments

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-ACO2-765F00515]
  2. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
  3. Government of Canada through Industry Canada
  4. Province of Ontario through Ministry of Research and Innovation
  5. NSF grant [PHY-0968854]
  6. Maryland Center for Fundamental Physics
  7. ERC grant BSMOXFORD [228169]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study novel scenarios where thermal dark matter (DM) can be efficiently captured in the Sun and annihilate into boosted dark matter. In models with semi-annihilating DM, where DM has a non-minimal stabilization symmetry, or in models with a multicomponent DM sector, annihilations of DM can give rise to stable dark sector particles with moderate Lorentz boosts. We investigate both of these possibilities, presenting concrete models as proofs of concept. Both scenarios can yield viable thermal relic DM with masses O(1)-O(100) GeV. Taking advantage of the energetic proton recoils that arise when the boosted DM scatters off matter, we propose a detection strategy which uses large volume terrestrial detectors, such as those designed to detect neutrinos or proton decays. In particular, we propose a search for proton tracks pointing towards the Sun. We focus on signals at Cherenkov-radiation-based detectors such as Super-Kamiokande (SK) and its upgrade Hyper-Kamiokande (HK). We find that with spin-dependent scattering as the dominant DM-nucleus interaction at low energies, boosted DM can leave detectable signals at SK or HK, with sensitivity comparable to DM direct detection experiments while being consistent with current constraints. Our study provides a new search path for DM sectors with non-minimal structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available