4.4 Article

Performance evaluation of a computer-aided detection algorithm for solid pulmonary nodules in low-dose and standard-dose MDCT chest examinations and its influence on radiologists

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 81, Issue 971, Pages 841-847

Publisher

BRITISH INST RADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/50635688

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm in low-dose and full-dose multicletector-row CT (MDCT) of the thorax and its impact on radiologists' performance. Chest CT examinations of 77 patients were evaluated retrospectively for pulmonary nodules. All patients had undergone a 16-slice MDCT chest examination with a standard acquistion protocol. Artificial image noise was added to the raw data to simulate image acquisition at 10 mAS(eff). The data were transferred to dedicated lung analysis software (LungCare (TM)) with a prototype CAD algorithm (LungCAD (TM)). CAD was applied to both dose settings. images were read by a radiologist and a first-year resident with and without the software at both dose settings. All images were reviewed in consensus by the two radiologists to set the reference standard. Sensitivity results with respect to the reference standard were compared. No statistically significant differences in the detection rate for all pulmonary nodules could be found between low-dose and full-dose settings for the CAD software alone (p=0.0065). Both radiologists displayed a statistically significant increase in sensitivity with the use of CAD (p<0.0001). In conclusion, CAD is beneficial in both low-dose and standard-dose settings. This may be beneficial in reducing false-negative diagnosis in lung cancer screening, standard chest examinations and the search for metastases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available