4.6 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: Childhood maltreatment and methylation of the glucocorticoid receptor gene NR3C1 in bipolar disorder (Retracted article. See vol. 205, pg. 249, 2014)

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 204, Issue 1, Pages 30-35

Publisher

ROYAL COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.120055

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss National Foundation [32003B_125469/1]
  2. NCCR Synapsy [320030_132853]
  3. AXA Research Foundation
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [32003B_125469, 320030_132853] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Early-life adversities represent risk factors for the development of bipolar affective disorder and are associated with higher severity of the disorder. This may be the consequence of a sustained alteration of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis resulting from epigenetic modifications of the gene coding for the glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1). Aims To investigate whether severity of childhood maltreatment is associated with increased methylation of the exon 1(F) NR3C1 promoter in bipolar disorder. Method A sample of people with bipolar disorder (n=99) were assessed for childhood traumatic experiences. The percentage of NR3C1 methylation was measured for each participant. Results The higher the number of trauma events, the higher was the percentage of NR3C1 methylation (beta = 0.52, 95% Cl 0.46-0.59, P << 0.0001). The severity of each type of maltreatment (sexual, physical and emotional) was also associated with NR3C1 methylation status. Conclusions Early-life adversities have a sustained effect on the HPA axis through epigenetic processes and this effect may be measured in peripheral blood. This enduring biological impact of early trauma may alter the development of the brain and lead to adult psychopathological disorder.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available