4.6 Article

Risk of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia in relatives of people with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 203, Issue 2, Pages 103-106

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.120808

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Stockholm County Council [ALF 20100305]
  2. Karolinska Institute [ALF 20100305]
  3. Swedish Medical Research Council [K2010-61X-21569-01-1, K2010-61P-21568-01-4, 2010-3184]
  4. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD061817]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, and it has been suggested that combined bipolar disorder and ADHD is aetiologically distinct from the pure disorders. Aims To clarify whether ADHD shares genetic and environmental factors with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Method By linking longitudinal Swedish national registers, we identified 61 187 persons with ADHD (the proband group) and their first- and second-degree relatives, and matched them with a control group of people without ADHD and their corresponding relatives. Conditional logistic regression was used to determine the risks of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia in the relatives of the two groups. Results First-degree relatives of the ADHD proband group were at increased risk of both bipolar disorder (odds ratio (OR) = 1.84-2.54 for parents, offspring and full siblings) and schizophrenia (OR = 1.71-2.22 for parents, offspring and full siblings). The risks of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia among second-degree relatives were substantially lower than among full siblings. Conclusions These findings suggest that the co-occurrence of ADHD and bipolar disorder as well as ADHD and schizophrenia is due to shared genetic factors, rather than representing completely aetiologically distinct subsyndromes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available