Cost-effectiveness of an early intervention service for people with psychosis

Background There is concern that delaying treatment for psychosis may have a negative impact on its long-term course. A number of countries have developed early intervention teams but there is limited evidence regarding their cost-effectiveness. Aims To compare the costs and cost-effectiveness of an early intervention service in London with standard care. Method Individuals in their first episode of psychosis (or those who had previously discontinued treatment) were recruited to the study. Clinical variables and costs were measured at baseline and then at 6- and 18-month follow-up. Information on quality of life and vocational outcomes were combined with costs to assess cost-effectiveness. Results A total of 144 people were randomised. Total mean costs were 11 685 in the early intervention group and 14062 in the standard care group, with the difference not being significant (95% CI -8128 pound to 3326) pound. When costs were combined with improved vocational and quality of life outcomes it was shown that early intervention would have a very high likelihood of being cost-effective. Conclusions Early intervention did not increase costs and was highly likely to be cost-effective when compared with standard care.