4.6 Article

Burden of chronic physical conditions and mental disorders in primary care

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 196, Issue 4, Pages 302-309

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.074211

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Direccia General de Planificacio i Avaluacio Sanitaria Departament de Salut - Generalitat de Catalunya
  2. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Institut de Salud Carlos III [RD06/0018/0017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The World Health Organization (WHO) has stated that the three leading causes of burden of disease in 2030 are projected to include HIV/AIDS, unipolar depression and ischaemic heart disease. Aims To estimate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) losses associated with mental disorders and chronic physical conditions in primary healthcare using data from the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders in primary care (DASMAP) study, an epidemiological survey carried out with primary care patients in Catalonia (Spain). Method A cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of 3815 primary care patients. A preference-based measure of health was derived from the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12): the Short Form-6D (SF-6D) multi-attribute health-status classification. Each profile generated by this questionnaire has a utility (or weight) assigned. We used non-parametric quantile regressions to model the association between both mental disorders and chronic physical condition and SF-6D scores. Results Conditions associated with SF-6D were: mood disorders, beta = -0.20 (95% CI -0.18 to -0.21); pain, beta = -0.08 (95%CI -0.06 to -0.09) and anxiety, beta = -0.04 (95% CI -0.03 to -0.06). The top three causes of QALY losses annually per 100 000 participants were pain (5064), mood disorders (2634) and anxiety (805). Conclusions Estimation of QALY losses showed that mood disorders ranked second behind pain-related chronic medical conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available