4.6 Article

High-potency cannabis and the risk of psychosis

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 195, Issue 6, Pages 488-491

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.064220

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Maudsley Charitable Fund
  2. UK National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre grant (BRC-SLAM)
  3. MRC [G108/603] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G108/603] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background People who use cannabis have an increased risk of psychosis, an effect attributed to the active ingredient Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta 9-THC). There has recently been concern over an increase in the concentration of Delta 9-THC in the cannabis available in many countries. Aims To investigate whether people with a first episode of psychosis were particularly likely to use high-potency cannabis. Method We collected information on cannabis use from 280 cases presenting with a first episode of psychosis to the South London & Maudsley National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, and from 174 healthy controls recruited from the local population. Results There was no significant difference between cases and controls in whether they had ever taken cannabis, or age at first use. However, those in the cases group were more likely to be current daily users (OR = 6.4) and to have smoked cannabis for more than 5 years (OR = 2.1). Among those who used cannabis, 78% of the cases group used high-potency cannabis (sinsemilla, 'skunk') compared with 37% of the control group (OR 6.8). Conclusions The finding that people with a first episode of psychosis had smoked higher-potency cannabis, for longer and with greater frequency, than a healthy control group is consistent with the hypothesis that Delta 9-THC is the active ingredient increasing risk of psychosis. This has important public health implications, given the increased availability and use of high-potency cannabis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available