4.7 Review

Hunting for the function of orphan GPCRs - beyond the search for the endogenous ligand

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 172, Issue 13, Pages 3212-3228

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bph.12942

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR 2011 -BSV1-012-01 'MLT2D', ANR-2011-META 'MELA-BETES', ANR-12-RPIB-0016 'MED-HET-REC-2']
  2. Fondation de la Recherche Medicale [Equipe FRM DEQ20130326503]
  3. Fondation ARC [SFI20121205906]
  4. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)
  5. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seven transmembrane-spanning proteins (7TM), also called GPCRs, are among the most versatile and evolutionary successful protein families. Out of the 400 non-odourant members identified in the human genome, approximately 100 remain orphans that have not been matched with an endogenous ligand. Apart from the classical deorphanization strategies, several alternative strategies provided recent new insights into the function of these proteins, which hold promise for high therapeutic potential. These alternative strategies consist of the phenotypical characterization of organisms silenced or overexpressing orphan 7TM proteins, the search for constitutive receptor activity and formation of protein complexes including 7TM proteins as well as the development of synthetic, surrogate ligands. Taken together, a variety of ligand-independent functions can be attributed to orphan 7TM proteins that range from constitutive activity to complex formation with other proteins and include true' orphans for which no ligand exist and conditional' orphans that behave like orphans in the absence of ligand and as non-orphans in the presence of ligand. Linked ArticlesThis article is part of a themed section on 5th BPS Focused Meeting on Cell Signalling. To view the other articles in this section visit

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available