4.7 Article

Hydrogen water consumption prevents osteopenia in ovariectomized rats

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 168, Issue 6, Pages 1412-1420

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bph.12036

Keywords

hydrogen; ovariectomy; oxidative stress; osteopenia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose Accumulating evidence indicates an important role of oxidative stress in the progression of osteoporosis. Recently, it was demonstrated that hydrogen gas, as a novel antioxidant, could selectively reduce hydroxyl radicals and peroxynitrite anion to exert potent therapeutic antioxidant activity. The aim of the present work was to investigate the effect of hydrogen water (HW) consumption on ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis. Experimental Approach Ovariectomized rats were fed with HW (1.3 +/- 0.2mg center dot L1) for 3 months. Then, blood was collected and femur and vertebrae were removed for evaluation of the effect of HW on bone. Key Results HW consumption in ovariectomized rats had no significant effect on oestrogen production, but prevented the reduction of bone mass including bone mineral content and bone mineral density in femur and vertebrae, and preserved mechanical strength including ultimate load, stiffness, and energy, and bone structure including trabecular bone volume fraction, trabecular number, and trabecular thickness in femur, and preserved mechanical strength including ultimate load and stiffness, and bone structure including trabecular bone volume fraction and trabecular number in vertebrae. In addition, treatment with HW abated oxidative stress and suppressed IL-6 and TNF- mRNA expressions in femur of ovariectomized rats; treatment with HW increased femur endothelial NOS activity and enhanced circulating NO level in ovariectomized rats. Conclusions and Implications HW consumption prevents osteopenia in ovariectomized rats possibly through the ablation of oxidative stress induced by oestrogen withdrawal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available