4.7 Review

Pharmacological modulation of connexin-formed channels in cardiac pathophysiology

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 163, Issue 3, Pages 469-483

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01244.x

Keywords

arrhythmia; cardiac ischaemia; connexins; gap junctions; hemichannels; peptides

Funding

  1. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders, Belgium (FWO) [G.0354.07, G.0140.08, 3G.0134.09]
  2. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Program (Belgian Science Policy) [P6/31]
  3. German Research Foundation [Schu 843/7-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coordinated electrical activity in the heart is supported by gap junction channels located at the intercalated discs of cardiomyocytes. Impaired gap junctional communication between neighbouring cardiomyocytes contributes to the development of re-entry arrhythmias after myocardial ischaemia. Current antiarrhythmic therapy is hampered by a lack of efficiency and side effects, creating the need for a new generation of drugs. In this review, we focus on compounds that increase gap junctional communication, thereby increasing the conduction velocity and decreasing the risk of arrhythmias. Some of these compounds also inhibit connexin 43 (Cx43) hemichannels, thereby limiting adenosine triphosphate loss and volume overload following ischaemia/reperfusion, thus potentially increasing the survival of cardiomyocytes. The compounds discussed in this review are: (i) antiarrythmic peptide (AAP), AAP10, ZP123; (ii) GAP-134; (iii) RXP-E; and (vi) the Cx mimetic peptides Gap 26 and Gap 27. None of these compounds have effects on Na+, Ca2+ and K+ channels, and therefore have no proarrhythmic activity associated with currently available antiarrhythmic drugs. GAP-134, RXP-E, Gap 26 and Gap 27 are pharmalogical agents with a favorable clinical safety profile, as already confirmed in phase I clinical trials for GAP-134. These agents show an excellent promise for treatment of arrhythmias in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available