4.8 Article

Overcoming the polyethylene glycol dilemma via pathological environment-sensitive change of the surface property of nanoparticles for cellular entry

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 206, Issue -, Pages 67-74

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.03.011

Keywords

Pathological environment-sensitivity; Intratumoral pH; Nanoparticles; Charge-inversion; Cancer therapy

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [25860030, 21790049]
  2. Kyoto Pharmaceutical University Fund for the Promotion of Scientific Research [10-13]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21790049, 25860030, 14J09314] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modification with polyethylene glycol (PEG) is currently considered an important strategy for anti-cancer drug delivery, because PEGylated-nanoparticles would be effectively delivered to tumor tissue by enhanced permeation and retention effects. However, PEGylation suppresses the cellular uptake of nanoparticles (NPs) to target cells (known as the PEG dilemma). Here, we propose a novel strategy, namely conferring a pathological environment-sensitive property of nanoparticles for overcoming the PEG dilemma. Specifically, although nanoparticles have an overall negative surface charge to avoid interactions with biogenic substances in blood circulation, inversion of surface charge (to positive) at the pH of the tumor microenvironment may allow the nanoparticles to be taken up by cancer cells. To prove this concept, charge-invertible nanoparticles modified with novel slightly acidic pH-sensitive peptide (SAPSP-NPs) were developed. The negatively-charged SAPSP-NPs were delivered to tumor tissue, and were successfully taken up by cancer cells upon inversion of the surface charge to positive at intratumoral pH. SAPSP-NPs may serve as an alternative carrier to the PEGylated NP for anticancer drug delivery. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available