4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

RIC-3: a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor chaperone

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages S177-S183

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707661

Keywords

nicotinic receptor; acetylcholine receptor; molecular chaperone; RIC-3

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council Funding Source: Medline
  3. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RIC-3 is a transmembrane protein which acts as a molecular chaperone of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). For some nAChR subtypes (such as homomeric alpha 7 neuronal nAChRs), RIC-3 is required for efficient receptor folding, assembly and functional expression. In contrast, for other nAChR subtypes (such as heteromeric alpha 4 beta 2 neuronal nAChRs) there have been reports that RIC-3 can both enhance and reduce levels of functional expression. There is also evidence that RIC-3 can modulate maturation of the closely related 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor (5-HT(3)R). As with heteromeric nAChRs, apparently contradictory results have been reported for the influence of RIC-3 on 5-HT(3)R maturation in different expression systems. Recent evidence indicates that these differences in RIC-3 chaperone activity may be influenced by the host cell, suggesting that other proteins may play an important role in modulating the effects of RIC-3 as a chaperone. RIC-3 was originally identified in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as the protein encoded by the gene ric-3 (resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase) and has subsequently been cloned and characterized from mammalian and insect species. This review provides a brief history of RIC-3; from the identification of the ric-3 gene in C. elegans in 1995 to the more recent demonstration of its activity as a nAChR chaperone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available