4.7 Article

Modulation of the myogenic response by neurogenic influences in rat small arteries

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 146, Issue 2, Pages 226-233

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706323

Keywords

arteries; innervation; mechanotransduction; smooth muscle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1 The hypothesis that the amplitude of the myogenic response is modulated by factors released from nerve endings was tested in rat tail small arteries. 2 A pressure myograph in conjunction with direct stimulation of nerve endings by electrical field stimulation ( EFS) was used to determine rat small artery contractile reactions. 3 Vessel pretreatment with 10(-5) M phentolamine abolished EFS-induced reactions completely indicating that they are mediated mainly by an adrenoceptor agonist, probably noradrenaline. 4 In the absence and presence of 10(-5) M phentolamine, vessel diameter changes in the pressure range from 10 to 120mmHg were not different. 5 Vessel stimulation by (i) EFS, (ii) noradrenaline, ( iii) selective stimulation of alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-receptors, (iv) serotonin, or ( v) vasopressin significantly reduced the diameter change induced by stepping pressure from 10 to 40mmHg compared to unstimulated, control vessels. 6 Vessel diameter changes induced by stepping pressure from 40 to 80 and from 80 to 120 mmHg, however, were not different in vessels stimulated with EFS and noradrenaline compared to controls. 7 In conclusion, these data show that factors released from unstimulated adrenergic nerve endings ( i. e., not stimulated by EFS) are not involved in the myogenic response. In contrast, factors released upon stimulation of nerve endings can modulate the amplitude of the myogenic response, but only at low pressures. Thus, the pressure range for myogenic blood flow autoregulation is extended to lower pressures. Myogenic autoregulation of blood flow at physiological pressures is unaltered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available