4.1 Article

Psychological characteristics of women who require orthognathic surgery: comparison with untreated controls

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 191-195

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.07.187

Keywords

Body image; Facial satisfaction; Mass media; Personality; Psychology; Orthognathic surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Improvement in appearance is an important motivation for orthodontic treatment and orthognathic Surgery. and two possible Underlying causes are objective physical abnormalities, or the patient's personality type that leads them to concentrate on their appearance and request unnecessary interventions. Questionnaires that measure personality traits were given to 30 women who required orthognathic operations. and a control group of 30 other women. Traits measured were: satisfaction with the appearance of the face. head, and body; tendency to compare their appearance with that of others; the extent to which they are aware of their appearance and how they thought they should look: sense of self identify: depression anxiety; and self-esteem. The only difference between patients and controls was that patients were more dissatisfied with their facial appearance than the others. Orthognathic patients were psychologically normal except that they had more dissatisfaction with their facial appearance. As this was the only difference, it is likely that their desire for operation Was Caused by a genuine physical abnormality rather than a perceived exaggerated aesthetic problem. It seems., therefore, that any patient who seeks orthognathic treatment because they have it personality that causes them to dwell on their appearance (which may lead them to hold unrealistic expectations of intervention) are screened Out of the process before they be,,in treatment. (C) 2008 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available