4.6 Article

Predictors of visual acuity and genotype-phenotype correlates in a cohort of patients with Stargardt disease

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages 513-518

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304270

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Research to Prevent Blindness
  2. Foundation Fighting Blindness, IRB [2365]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To assess the genotypic diversity in patients with Stargardt disease and to characterise epidemiological and genotypic predictors of phenotype. Methods Retrospective, cross-sectional study of 112 patients with Stargardt disease. We evaluated the correlation between age at presentation, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and ABCA4 genotypes. Results Mean age at presentation was 30 +/- 16 years (range 6-78 years) for the 112 patients of 104 families. 98 of 90 families had a probable molecular diagnosis. We found that BCVA is not related to age of presentation in a linear or polynomial manner; that BCVA of patients presenting in the first decade was significantly worse than those presenting in later decades (p=0.04); that patients who harboured two or more mutations presented earlier and had worse BCVA than those with no or 1 mutation identified by any method of testing (n=112, p=3.29x10(-6)) or by full sequencing (n=32, p=0.02); that 16 patients with c.5882G>A allele demonstrated better BCVA than the remaining patients (p=0.01); and that 10 patients with the c.5461-10T>C mutation presented earlier (p=0.02x10(-5)) and had more severe disease. Conclusions Epidemiological and genotypical findings portend visual prognosis in patients with Stargardt disease. Select sequence variations in ABCA4 may confer a specific phenotype. The present data will help in assessing patients for emerging therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available