4.6 Article

Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene as a substrate for retinal pigment epithelial cell growth and transplantation in age-related macular degeneration

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 4, Pages 569-573

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2009.169953

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Research & Development Support Fund
  2. Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals
  3. The Dunhill Medical Trust
  4. Fight for Sight

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) transplantation presents a potential treatment for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). A suitable transplant membrane that can support an intact functioning RPE monolayer is required. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) possesses the physical properties required for a transplanting device; however, cells do not attach and spread on ePTFE. This study investigated the ability of surface-modified ePTFE to optimise the growth and function of healthy RPE monolayers. Methods ePTFE discs were modified by ammonia gas plasma treatment. ARPE-19 cells were seeded on the membranes and maintained in media supplemented with retinoic acid and reduced serum. Cell number, morphology and proliferation were analysed. RPE monolayer function was investigated through formation of celle-cell junctions and phagocytosis of photoreceptor outer segments (POS). Results Ammonia gas plasma treatment resulted in enhanced cell growth and good monolayer formation with evidence of celle-cell junctional proteins. Furthermore, RPE monolayers were able to phagocytose POS in a time-dependent manner. Conclusions ePTFE can be surface-modified to support an intact functional monolayer of healthy RPE cells with normal morphology and the ability to perform RPE-specific functions. Following further investigation ePTFE may be considered for use in transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available