4.6 Article

Determination of a gene and environment risk model for age-related macular degeneration

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 94, Issue 10, Pages 1382-1387

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2010.182568

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Macular Disease Society
  2. Macular Vision Research Foundation
  3. Brian Mercer Charitable Trust
  4. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0507-10094] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/aims We have recently identified an association between age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and genetic variants in the serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade G, member 1 (SERPING1) gene. In the current study we interrogated the genomic region in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the SERPING1 gene, and modelled the contribution to disease of known genetic and environmental AMD risk factors. Methods We analysed genes neighbouring SERPING1 and examined haplotype association with AMD. A stepwise logistic regression model was developed including known genetic and environmental risk factors (age, sex and smoking). Individual risk scores were assessed between groups of cases and controls. Results In SERPING1 region rs2511989 remains most significantly associated (p=1.77X10(-5), OR 0.67). One haplotype, containing the rs2511989 variant and the majority of SERPING1, exhibits marginally stronger association (p=5.13X10(-6), OR 0.66). Our risk model includes six SNPs in CFH, C3, HTRA1 and SERPING1, showing independent effects, which together account for 45% of risk of developing AMD (p=1.65X10(-50)) with a combined population attributable risk of 87%. Conclusion Results implicate SERPING1, with no convincing evidence for involvement of other genes in the region. We demonstrate a multifactorial model with significant differences in risk scores for cases versus controls (p=9.813X10(-71)) and across Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) score-stratified cases (p=1.88X10(-11)).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available