4.6 Article

Mutations in the quinolone resistance determining region in Staphylococcus epidermidis recovered from conjunctiva and their association with susceptibility to various fluoroquinolones

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages 848-851

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2007.129858

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Staphylococcus epidermidis is one of the prominent pathogens in ocular infection. The prevalence of mutations in the quinolone resistance determining region (QRDR) area in S epidermidis isolated from the ocular surface and its association with fluoroquinolone resistance has not been fully elucidated. Methods: Mutations in the QRDR of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes of 138 isolates of S epidermidis recovered from the human conjunctival flora were analysed. The minimal inhibitory concentrations ( MICs) of four fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin and tosufloxacin) against these isolates were also determined using agar dilution methods. Results: The MIC90 values of levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin and tosufloxacin were 3.13, 1.56, 0.78 and 3.13 mu g/ml, respectively. The MIC values of all fluoroquinolones showed a bimodal distribution ( susceptible strain and less susceptible strain). Mutations with amino acid substitution in the QRDR were present in 70 ( 50.7%) isolates. 19 different combinations of mutations were detected: 3 isolates ( 2.2%) had four mutations, 8 ( 5.8%) had three mutations, 43 ( 31.2%) had double mutations and 16 ( 11.6%) had single mutations. Isolates with mutations in the QRDR of both gyrA and parC ( n= 53) were less susceptible to fluoroquinolones. Conclusions: The present findings show that approximately half the S epidermidis isolates from the normal human conjunctiva have mutation( s) in the QRDR. The presence of mutations in both gyrA and parC is strongly associated with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available