4.4 Review

Effect of probiotic fermented milk on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 110, Issue 7, Pages 1188-1194

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114513001712

Keywords

Probiotics; Fermented milk; Blood pressure; Meta-analyses; Randomised controlled trials

Funding

  1. Nestec Limited (Nestle R& D (China) Limited)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies have suggested that probiotic fermented milk may possess blood pressure (BP)-lowering properties. In the present study, we aimed to systematically examine the effect of probiotic fermented milk on BP by conducting a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PubMed, Cochrane library and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched up to March 2012 to identify eligible studies. The reference lists of the obtained articles were also reviewed. Either a fixed-effects or a random-effects model was used to calculate the combined treatment effect. Meta-analysis of fourteen randomised placebo-controlled trials involving 702 participants showed that probiotic fermented milk, compared with placebo, produced a significant reduction of 3.10mmHg (95% CI -4.64, -1.56) in systolic BP and 1.09mmHg (95% CI -2.11, -0.06) in diastolic BP. Subgroup analyses suggested a slightly greater effect on systolic BP in hypertensive participants than in normotensive ones (-3.98 v. -2.09 mmHg). Analysis of trials conducted in Japan showed a greater reduction than those conducted in European countries for both systolic BP (-6.12 v. -2.08 mmHg) and diastolic BP (-3.45 v. -0.52 mmHg). Some evidence of publication bias was present, but sensitivity analysis excluding small trials that reported extreme results only affected the pooled effect size minimally. In summary, the present meta-analysis suggested that probiotic fermented milk has BP-lowering effects in pre-hypertensive and hypertensive subjects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available