4.4 Article

Breakfast and exercise contingently affect postprandial metabolism and energy balance in physically active males

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages 721-732

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114512005582

Keywords

Appetite; Fasted state; Glycaemia; Fat oxidation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study examined the impact of breakfast and exercise on postprandial metabolism, appetite and macronutrient balance. A sample of twelve (blood variables n 11) physically active males completed four trials in a randomised, crossover design comprising a continued overnight fast followed by: (1) rest without breakfast (FR); (2) exercise without breakfast (FE); (3) breakfast consumption (1859 kJ) followed by rest (BR); (4) breakfast consumption followed by exercise (BE). Exercise was continuous, moderate-intensity running (expending approximately 2.9MJ of energy). The equivalent time was spent sitting during resting trials. A test drink (1500 kJ) was ingested on all trials followed 90 min later by an ad libitum lunch. The difference between the BR and FR trials in blood glucose time-averaged AUC following test drink consumption approached significance (BR: 4.33 (SEM 0.14) v. FR: 4.75 (SEM 0.16) mmol/l; P=0.08); but it was not different between FR and FE (FE: 4.77 (SEM 0.14) mmol/l; P=0.65); and was greater in BE (BE: 4.97 (SEM 0.13) mmol/l) v. BR (P=0.012). Appetite following the test drink was reduced in BR v. FR (P=0.006) and in BE v. FE (P=0.029). Following lunch, the most positive energy balance was observed in BR and least positive in FE. Regardless of breakfast, acute exercise produced a less positive energy balance following ad libitum lunch consumption. Energy and fat balance is further reduced with breakfast omission. Breakfast improved the overall appetite responses to foods consumed later in the day, but abrogated the appetite-suppressive effect of exercise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available