4.4 Article

The impact of obesity-related SNP on appetite and energy intake

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 110, Issue 6, Pages 1151-1156

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114513000147

Keywords

Appetite; Genotype; Fat mass and obesity-associated gene; Leptin; Leptin receptor; Melanocortin-4 receptor

Funding

  1. Barham Benevolent Trust Studentship
  2. DairyCo UK
  3. Dairy Council UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An increasing number of studies have reported a heritable component for the regulation of energy intake and eating behaviour, although the individual polymorphisms and their 'effect size' are not fully elucidated. The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between specific SNP and appetite responses and energy intake in overweight men. In a randomised cross-over trial, forty overweight men (age 32 (SD 09) years; BMI 27 (SD 2) kg/m(2)) attended four sessions 1 week apart and received three isoenergetic and isovolumetric servings of dairy snacks or water (control) in random order. Appetite ratings were determined using visual analogue scales and energy intake at an ad libitum lunch was assessed 90 min after the dairy snacks. Individuals were genotyped for SNP in the fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO), leptin (LEP), leptin receptor (LEPR) genes and a variant near the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) locus. The postprandial fullness rating over the full experiment following intake of the different snacks was 17.2% (P=0.026) lower in A carriers compared with TT homozygotes for rs9939609 (FTO, dominant) and 18.6% (P=0.020) lower in G carriers compared with AA homozygotes for rs7799039 (LEP, dominant). These observations indicate that FTO and LEP polymorphisms are related to the variation in the feeling of fullness and may play a role in the regulation of food intake. Further studies are required to confirm these initial observations and investigate the 'penetrance' of these genotypes in additional population subgroups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available