4.4 Article

Growth, clinical chemistry and immune function in domestic piglets fed varying ratios of arachidonic acid and DHA

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages 809-816

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S000711451100359X

Keywords

Arachidonic acid; DHA; Growth; Long-chain PUFA; Piglets

Funding

  1. Martek Biosciences Corporation (Columbia, MD, USA)
  2. DSM Food Specialties (Delft, The Netherlands)
  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [T32DK007158]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the USA, infant formulas contain long-chain PUFA arachidonic acid (ARA) and DHA in a ratio of 2:1 and comprise roughly 0.66 g/100 g and 0.33 g/100 g total fatty acids (FA). Higher levels of dietary DHA appear to provide some advantages in visual or cognitive performance. The present study evaluated the effect of physiologically high dietary ARA on growth, clinical chemistry, haematology and immune function when DHA is 1.0 g/100 g total FA. On day 3 of age, formula-reared (FR) piglets were matched for weight and assigned to one of six milk replacer formulas. Diets varied in the ratio of ARA:DHA as follows (g/100 g FA/FA): A1, 0.1/1.0; A2, 0.53/1.0; A3-D3, 0.69/1.0; A4, 1.1/1.0; D2, 0.67/0.62; D1, 0.66/0.33. A seventh group was maternal-reared (MR) and remained with the dam during the study. Blood collection and body weight measurements were performed weekly, and piglets were killed on day 28 of age. No significant differences were found among any of the FR groups for formula intake, growth, clinical chemistry, haematology or immune status measurements. A few differences in clinical chemistry, haematology and immune function parameters between the MR pigs and the FR groups probably reflected a difference in growth rate. We conclude that the dietary ARA level up to 1.0 g/100 g total FA is safe and has no adverse effect on any of the safety outcomes measured, and confirm that DHA has no adverse effect when ARA is at 0.66 g/100 g FA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available